Back 2 Health Family Wellness Center Pensacola Fl

Yous know near how individuals proceeds control of the power of the State and and then abuse that power like onetime U.s. President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly assisting for some U.s. businesses.  He achieved this b y challenge Iraq had a nuclear weapons program which was a serious globe security threat when Republic of iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion past the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush-league United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 February 2011.

Remember how Bush was supported by UK Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the U.s. with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did non exist but which Blair claimed could be deployed within xl minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that so y'all will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade u.s.a. we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can salvage us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this solar day.

On CHS nosotros wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that bluntly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about as a outcome of the interaction of three completely unlike factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living weather condition, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to piece of work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Small-scale Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease chosen smallpox and it did impale people long ago.

This was specially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and high-strung them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London's commencement park congenital after rich feared affliction spread from slums UK The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized Earth.

The heart and upper classes needed to exist reassured the State would continue them safe from the threat of affliction.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this past ensuring the and so truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the affliction controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth merely the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" however contracted the affliction: Smallpox Mortality, United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland, Us, Sweden.

Now yous can read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- UK, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs beneath find the big numbers of deaths acquired by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished past vaccination, every bit the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the United kingdom and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table below].  Leicester'southward arroyo also cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Menstruation.	Minor-Pox.  Cases	Modest-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Nippon	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.viii
British Ground forces (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.one
British Army (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	eleven.i
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.8
Regal Navy	1860-1908	two,909	234	8.0
Thou Totals and instance fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	i,206	61	five.one

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Nippon, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would take soared with a corresponding result—but on the opposite side."

TABLE 29.

Small-scale-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Pocket-size-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Price of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	nine,659	1,594	sixteen.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	v.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.10	£i,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– August 27, 2013

With the budgeted influenza season and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, you might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the thought of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books present a elementary tale of the origin of vaccination. Virtually present the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a elementary country doctor and his backbone in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening affliction of that time – smallpox, or as it was often called the speckled monster. In a contempo and popular book, The Panic Virus, the writer reiterates this archetype tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year former boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd fabricated in Phipps's hands. The boy came downwardly with a slight fever, only nix more. Subsequently, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, admitting mild, case of the disease. Cypher happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox in one case more; once more, nothing. [i]

Edward Jenner'due south thought eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but somewhen the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the kid-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly ophidian-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a mortiferous enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a unproblematic and memorable story of a hero defeating the mortiferous enemy, smallpox. Authors merits that with vaccination in identify, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, peculiarly those that are used to support a conventionalities, attain an iconic status while whatsoever unsavory aspects nearly the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using modest amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better confronting the disease than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and identify in the futurity.

The idea was embraced past the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. Only because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could only be afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often help protect the individual that was inoculated, but in that location was nonetheless an estimated 2-5% that died every bit a result.[iv,five] Still, this was an comeback compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[half dozen] Simply, was the difference in bloodshed due to inoculation lone? Or could it have had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of society?

There was one major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years earlier the introduction of variolation to the 38 years later, and plant that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse bug, because it acquired more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contamination, for a contagious affliction is produced by Inoculation where information technology would not otherwise have been produced; the place where information technology is thus produced becomes a middle of contagion, whence it spreads non less fatally or widely than it would spread from a eye where the disease should happen in a natural style; these centers of contamination are obviously multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[7]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the trouble of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had become a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued by well-nigh of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early on 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored amidst milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-year-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the kid to smallpox as a exam to see if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did non contract clinical smallpox, information technology was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results challenge lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, in that location were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a coming together of the Doc-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The moo-cow doctors could take told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the beginning at that place were bug with Jenner'due south procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox process had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the study but decided to ignore the results because they were not in support of his theory.[ix]

Vaccination was quickly embraced past many in the medical profession every bit the respond to combating smallpox. Past 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical customs continued to embrace Jenner's ideas amid numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the terminate of the year 1799. A month later it was inoculated with small-pox affair without effect, and a few months after took confluent small-scale-pox and died. ii. A adult female-servant to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. 7 years later she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught small-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of historic period, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were bodacious of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's office . . . died of small-pox a yr after vaccination.[ten]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accrue showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-scale-pox afterwards vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality charge per unit as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This loftier fatality charge per unit along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a straight challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Some other article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering nether Small Pox, who take previously undergone Vaccination by the nigh practiced practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with thirty years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his feel with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no 1 in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." But afterwards vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the hope of vaccination. His experience was that, later on vaccination, people still could contract and fifty-fifty dice from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practice.[thirteen]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to cover it as a new form of income. Information technology is therefore quite significant for a doctor to have spoken out against it as Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, ane, and, 2 [1820-1822] in that location was a neat hubbub about the small-pox. Information technology broke out with the great epidemic to the north . . . It pressed close to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox before, and ofttimes severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, information technology left some alone, just fell upon great numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, announcer, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote near the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical do. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, accept taken the real small-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine material was the "humanized" class, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but every bit failures increased there was a conventionalities that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and there were calls to obtain fresh material directly from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner really believed the textile originated from an infectious condition of horses chosen the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was only smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[18] This faulty conventionalities would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow'south udder. He and so took pus from that cow and used information technology to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later enquiry adamant that this was nothing more than than the one-time practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not only was vaccination declining and causing smallpox epidemics, just there were also reports of deaths from other causes shortly subsequently vaccination. For instance, a pare condition chosen erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to die.

. . . a male child from Somers-town, aged five years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the historic period of four months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (viii days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; 2 good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a carbohydrate bakery, aged xiii weeks, died of "general erysipelas afterwards vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could exist spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the University at Paris.

First I rejected the thought that syphilis could be transplanted past vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more than, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At nowadays I do non hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was non what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In social club to bargain with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nothing to curb the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, in that location were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the dandy 1872 epidemic. Later on 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-sixty, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the well-nigh severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no event at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

Past this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection confronting smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination fabricated smallpox less probable to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were and then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being made by vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the force of police force created the perfect surroundings that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western globe.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 lone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present twelvemonth they will go near a quarter million. Other sums, likewise, which I cannot name, accept been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. Nevertheless, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A keen pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war in that location were xx-three thousand four hundred and lx-nine cases of small-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand three hundred and 90-2 pocket-sized-pox patients in London hospitals, half dozen thou eight hundred and 50-iv had been vaccinated. Seventeen and half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole state more than one hundred and 20-two 1000 vaccinated persons have suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Frg show that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some fifty-fifty accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the great sit-in in Leicester England, in 1885. That same yr Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to ten%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective ways that eliminated the need for vaccination. Even so, in that location were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the depression vaccination charge per unit would upshot in a terrible "massacre," specially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the bulk of the boondocks'due south residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was non necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come up to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall subtract in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The feel of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an centre-sore to the pro-vaccinists the globe over. Here is a great manufacturing boondocks having a population of nearly a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an experience extending over a menses of more a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less affected by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted every bit a safe process, it often caused sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality charge per unit vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph iv: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. After the summer of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the Us. Smallpox turned from a affliction that killed one in 5 of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from i in 50 and later to as low as one in 380. The affliction could still kill, but having become so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the state. The mortality was very low and information technology [smallpox] was ordinarily at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death charge per unit was around 20%, equally it had been historically. The table also showed that after 1896 the death rate savage off chop-chop, starting with 6% in 1897 to every bit depression as 0.26% by 1908. As the mild form of smallpox replaced the archetype type, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a balmy disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a pocket-sized communicable disease of childhood, and is importantly important because it oftentimes gives ascension to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s information technology was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced petty in the way of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or fifty-fifty epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the grade of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely depression vaccine coverage charge per unit, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the last smallpox death in the United States in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 report detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a pare condition due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be between 1 in twenty,000 to i in 100,000 with a fatality rate of iv to 40%.[35] However, they acknowledged that most cases were not reported and there was no authentic accounting on this consequence of vaccination. There were too an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the consequence of smallpox vaccination, while during the same fourth dimension there had only been 1 smallpox expiry in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox expiry in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, only since that time there take been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, every bit recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military machine father later on the father was vaccinated. After a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother as well required handling and virus was establish all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been even college. This report only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United states of america. If the deaths were this high in a country with a modernistic wellness-intendance system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the entire world?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which in one case had the suffrage of the nation has now inappreciably a serious supporter. We are aback to jettison the idea completely and peradventure afraid that if we did the accident of some time to come epidemic might put us in the wrong. We prefer to permit compulsory vaccination dice a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attending is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as virtually the only medically promoted mode to deal with affliction, there were doctors finding astonishing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a mutual food product that is made through fermentation of a diversity of sources. An 1877 commodity described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. K. Oliphant, K.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the commodity on the use of Acetic acid in reddish fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" every bit practical to modest pox. Dr. Roth get-go claimed wonderful success in handling regarding vinegar more reliable equally a safety in small-pox than Belladonna in cerise fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, later on breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while amongst those nether ordinary treatment the mortality was every bit usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's power to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the illness. The writer notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Over again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the thought of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other blazon of vinegar should exist used 3 or 4 times a twenty-four hours to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretarial assistant of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past accept been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Whatsoever person who has been exposed demand accept no fear of smallpox if he will accept two or 3 tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar iii or four times a day." The discussion may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at concluding is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, but but because most people take been conditioned to accept the age-one-time prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal's (usually a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced nutrition. Vitamin C is essential for the germination of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in pare, basic, and blood vessels and besides gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve equally mortar property cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of Rex'south College, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, java, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient nutrition led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent amongst the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living about entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour made into concoction-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is done downwardly with copious librations of strong coffee, and big quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, nether a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the aforementioned time subjected to the most intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Blitz of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice equally many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in boxing.[44] For instance, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such equally smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died as a result of their wounds accounted only for one per centum of the total deaths.

Other large infectious killers such as scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (likewise known equally pertussis) all greatly declined during this fourth dimension to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses past the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping coughing and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph five & 6).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a land doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a central medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a colonnade of their vaccine faith. But the true history shows us a different reality.

The brand proper noun of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche equally something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the aforementioned notion of injecting whole or parts of illness matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific affliction. The reality of vaccination is aught close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and accept since vanished from societal collective retention. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner'due south great discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the pall has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, exercise more and more than vaccines seem like a good idea to yous?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies tin can exist found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's volume "Dissolving Illusions" which tin be constitute on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
ii.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
iii.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Wellness, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the Starting time Planting, Progressive Improvements and Nowadays Land of the British Settlements of N-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
vi.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practise of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Mag and Historical Relate, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
nine.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, Medico, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination past Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. 8, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Chocolate-brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. 2, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present Land of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Dr.-chirurgical review and periodical of applied medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Advice and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
nineteen.Ephraim Cutter, Medico, "Fractional Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United States," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the Land of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. four, February 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February x, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.Chiliad. W. Harman, Medico, "A Physician'southward Argument Confronting the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Cursory: A Monthly Periodical of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April sixteen, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to exist Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. fifteen.
31.J. Westward. Hodge, Doc, "How Small-scale-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. Iii, no. xvi, Jan, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Communicable diseases equally Shown by the History of Smallpox in the Us," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Cost Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Visitor, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Md and Howard A. Joos Physician, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, Academy of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale periodical of biological science and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, Jan 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acerb Acrid in Carmine Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Periodical of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Foreclose Smallpox," The Critique, January fifteen, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. VI, no. ane, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Wellness. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Do good to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Written report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safe, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

cunninghamprif1967.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post